FL Turbo wrote:
> On Thu, 24 Jul 2008 19:52:17 -0700, "risky biz"
> <risky-biz@[EMAIL PROTECTED]
> wrote:
>
>> On Jul 23 2008 8:12 PM, risky biz wrote:
>>
>>> After demonstarting to the whole world weeks ago that he doesn't know
the
>>> difference between a Sunni and a ****'ite, last week he refers to the
>>> Iraq/Pakistan border (no such border, Iran is located between them,
for
>>> the Republicains here).
>>>
>>> And this week he once again makes it quite clear that he doesn't have
the
>>> slightest idea what's going on in Iraq. This is the Republicain
candidate
>>> with the "national security credentials" who maintains that his trips
to
>>> Iraq have made him better qualified than Obama. They must have been
>>> prancing him around like a village idiot while they recorded the
video:
>>>
>>> "The major Sunni sheik who John McCain said was protected by the surge
and
>>> subsequently helped lead the Anbar Awakening, was actually
assassinated by
>>> an al-Qaeda led group in midst of the surge.
>>>
>>> On Tuesday evening, McCain falsely claimed that the downturn in
violence
>>> in Iraq's Anbar province was a result of the surge, when in fact the
surge
>>> began months afterward. Moreover, he said, if it weren't for the work
of
>>> U.S. forces, the major Sunni figure leading that awakening wouldn't
have
>>> had the protection he needed.
>>>
>>> "Colonel MacFarland was contacted by one of the major Sunni sheiks,"
said
>>> the Senator. "Because of the surge we were able to go out and protect
that
>>> sheik and others. And it began the Anbar awakening."
>>>
>>
http://www.huffingtonpost.com/2008/07/23/anbar-****ek-cited-by-mcca_n_114581.html"
>>
>> Irish Mike, Bub, FL Turbo . . . McCain's cheering section. No wonder
Obama
>> is raising more campaign contributions in Arizona than McCain.
>>
>
> No big news to VRWC members who have been following McCain's act for
> all these years.
> Conservative Arizonans have been tired of his Maverick act for years
> now.
> He has been sticking his finger in the eyes of Conservatives every
> other day, to get to be the darling of the MSM.
> Now he is seeing just exactly what that bought him.
>
> As the great pundit and prognosticator, Rush Limbaugh said years ago,
> If McCain ever got his wish and was the Candidate (presumptive) of the
> Repos, the MSM would dump him like a hot potato.
>
> Prophetic.
>
> We see it now.
> Obama has now become the darling of the MSM.
> A democrat.
> Exactly as predicted.
>
> McCain now can't get the time of day from his former friends in the
> MSM.
>
> When Obama went on his world tour, all 3 Major network Anchors went
> off with him.
> Not just the re****ters, mind you.
> The bleeping Anchors.
> Just like little ducklings following Mama Duck.
>
> The NY Times published Obama's op-ed, no questions asked.
> The NY Times rejected McCain's op-ed, and told him to submit a
> re-write according to their "suggested" guidelines.
> Ain't that worthy of at least a <giggle, snort> ?
>
A colleague of mine was published in the same damn journal that
requested I do some editing to something I had submitted.
Waaa! Waaa! Must be a conspiracy!!!
> So as you see, the Great MahaRu**** was 100% accurate in his
> predictions.
>
> He knew the MSM inside and out.
> He knew Sen. McRinoPain inside and out.
>
Or he had seen both of them on the TeeVee before, and said "Wow, one of
these guys has much more TV presence than the other."
I would say that makes him as perceptive as, roughly, 90% of the world
population.
> As for me, I'm sitting this one out.
> I can see the plus side of either McCain or Obama getting to be
> President.
> Neither one is a pleasant prospect for the future of the USA, but we
> will still survive after either of them.
>
>
I won't vote for Obama. Having said that, trying to pretend that he
isn't a billion times more charismatic, and a trillion times better at
giving stirring speeches, than McCain, simply shows just how
disconnected from reality you've become, FL.
Complain all you want. McCain might be a better President, but he'd
make a much worse TV personality. And that, my friend, is all the
explanation you need.
Cheers.
|
