On Jul 24 2008 5:22 PM, Kingo Gondo wrote:
>
> OK, now I know you are a lameass.
That means a lot coming from someone unable to make anything even remotely
approach an intelligent, reasoned argument.
> A DC ****ing 8--when was that designed, the 50s or 60s?
Yeah...with no significant modernizations or upgrades since that time,
right. That must be why they're still being used.
> > - Flight BA038 (a Boeing 777) crash-landed at Heathrow when both
engines
> > cut off during an autopilot-assisted landing. At this point an
avionics
> > failure is suspected as the cause.
>
> Oh, some big explantion you have thee:
>
> http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/British_Airways_Flight_38
Uhhhh....and? Where's the indication of human error there? You
know...like you claimed must be the case, dumbass?
> > There are others, but more enlightening results can be found by
searching
> > on "airliner", "crash" and "single point failure".
> >
> >> > You seem to think that propensity for fragmentation/penetration is
an
> >> > inherent property of a given caliber.
> >>
> >> Nope.
> >
> > It's rather odd then that you made a statement to that effect.
>
>
> I didn't--your enormous powers of induction created one. That is a
polite
> way of saying it was a figment of your imagination.
Actually, it was my power of literacy. Your own quotes:
- "Moreover, their caliber of choice, along with the Secret Service, is
357SIG--very high velocity, very penetrating."
- "If people want the opposite, they should just go with a .45 ACP
frangible--a very big, very slow "snowball"."
See if you can figure that one out, Goober.
> > Ah, the old, "clear test results be damned...I believe such-and-such
and
> > anyone who disagrees with me must be an idiot" position. Very
compelling.
>
> Please, you and your imaginary tests.
LOL! You're about as dense as they come. I'm just waiting for you to try
to tell us what you think you know about physics as they apply to
ballistics.
> Numerous agencies, particualrly those are interested in the subject in
the
> real world (usually highway patrols) do all kinds of testing. That's why
> state police/HWPs are the number 1 adopters of the 357SIG:
>
> http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/.357_SIG#Implementation
You have an amazing fondness for citing web pages that do absolutely
nothing to sup****t your argument. Do you just randomly cut-n-paste the
first link that shows up as a result of a half-assed Google search?
> Another internet jerk-off artist.
What an approprate signature line for you.
_____________________________________________________________________
: the next generation of web-newsreaders : http://www.recgroups.com
|
