In another thread K.T. Constanjuror88poet and I have a running
conversation.
K.T. said:
>NEWSFLASH: Ladd made
> unfounded accusations against people then weaseled and tried to run
> from them. His actions/behavior were abominable and should NOT be
> forgotten.
I said:
You hide behind KT now, but I'm pretty sure I know who you are. You
changed
your "name" so you could post without having everyone keep reminding you
about how narrowminded and vicious you were back then. You're starting it
up again and if you keep at it you'll have to change your "name" again.
People can see what you're trying to do. They can look at the posts and
figure out that you're trying to make a mountain out of a molehill. Keep
it up. Bury yourself.
From another post in that thread we continue:
"K.T. Constanjuror88poet" <ktconstanjuror88poet@[EMAIL PROTECTED]
> wrote in message
news:addc74tt838j72od15ipadq1siprm8nben@[EMAIL PROTECTED]
> long running conversation </snip>
I said:
>>I DON'T KNOW WHO YOU ARE.
>>I said I'm pretty sure I know who you are but I never said I was
certain.
>
He said:
> You said: "You changed your "name" so you could post without having
> everyone keep reminding you about how narrowminded and vicious you
> were back then. You're starting it up again and if you keep at it
> you'll have to change your "name" again." (Robert Ladd)
>
> The above is a definitive statement... don't you understand that,
> weasel?
>
> How do you know that I changed my "name" so I could post "without
> having everyone keep reminding" me about how "narrowminded and
> vicious" I was back then? HOW DO YOU KNOW, Ladd? Your statement is a
> definitive one. Again: HOW DO YOU KNOW?...so as you can make such a
> definitive statement... HOW DO YOU KNOW, weasel?
>
back to me on this post:
Actually, he snipped my first line when he copied it, which said, "You
hide
behind KT now, but I'm pretty sure I know who you are." But, he does have
the rest of the quote correct up to the point that he copied it. And he
is
correct that within that paragraph I made a definitive statement. That
was
the wrong thing to do. I should have prefaced the "You changed your
"name""
with "I believe" or "I think" or "I assume". That was a mistake. I also
spoke for the whole group when I said all of the rest of the sentences
within that paragraph. I should have put the "I believe", etc. before
each
of them. More mistakes that I admit that I made and I apologize for. I
sometimes get lazy, and this was one of those times.
Here is where it gets interesting though, He said:
>>> I told you I'll cop to it *IF* you get it right... gee, you seemed so
>>> very certain in your last post, even saying I was hiding now as KT...
>>> c'mon, Ladd... who *is* this narrowminded and vicious person that now
>>> has to hide as KT?... HUH... WHO?
>>>
>>
I said:
>>I doubt you actually thought I'd fall for this, but I can't blame you
for
>>giving it a shot.
>
He said:
> Fall for WHAT? (stop looking at things through your weasel eyes!)
>
>
I said:
>>Who knows, in a weak moment I might have fallen for that
>>one. But no, you and I and everyone on this group knows that would be a
>>very silly ploy for me to fall for.
>
He said:
> No ploy... and this kinda thinking only illuminates more of your
> weasel-like mindset.
>
I said:
>> Whether I got it right or not would be
>>irrelevant.
>
He said:
> This is, like a lot of what you say, UNTRUE.
>
>
I said:
>>You'd just say that I was wrong.
>
Finally, the point of this post, He said:
> ABSOLUTELY UNTRUE, period.
>
> If you -- or anybody else for that matter -- correctly I.D.'d me, I
> would indeed cop to it.
>
>
I said:
>>You don't actually think I'd
>>believe that you'd "cop" to it, do you?
>
HE SAID:
> Well, upon reflection, I guess I didn't take into account that a
> weasel like you would figure that everyone would just do what they'd
> do and not cop to it but YEAH, as an honest person myself, I initially
> actually believed that if you identified me correctly you would think
> I'd cop to it... which, of course, I would have (and would still do).
>
Okay, so that's where we stand. As the honest person that he is, we can
all
take guesses as to who he was when I was posting before, and if "anybody
else for that matter" correctly I.D's him from that time he says that he
will "cop" to it.
Robert Ladd
|
