Talk About Network

Google


Register and Login
Nick
Password
Register create new account Sign up is FREE and you can post replies, new topics, bookmark posts and more!
Recover lost password


Gambling > Poker > Ed Miller colum...
Latest [ Topics | Posts ] Archive Post A New Topic Post a Reply
<< Topic < Post Post 1 of 30 Topic 209042 of 216827
Post > Topic >>

Ed Miller columns

by "Vince" <vcuccia122@[EMAIL PROTECTED] > May 31, 2008 at 07:20 AM

Ed Miller wrote this in one of his columns:

"I don't touch any of these hands when out of position. And while 9-8
suited
is better than 10-8 offsuit or 6-3 suited, it's not that much better. I
usually don't play 9-8 suited when out of position, either. It's harder to
steal when you don't have position. It's harder to play your draw when you
don't have position. It's harder to win a big pot when you don't have
position. You don't make your money playing out of position. It's that
simple."

In another column, he wrote this:

 "Let's say a loose and aggressive player opens for $30 in a $5-$10
no-limit
game. A weak player calls from the button. Everyone folds to you in the
big
blind, and you have the 10 6. You consider three options: folding,
calling,
and reraising.  I think, for sure, you should reraise. Why? It widens your
range. Think about what hands you'll be reraising here. You'll reraise
pocket aces and kings, and perhaps queens, jacks, and A-K. You should
probably reraise a number of other strong hands, as well.
If you reraise only good hands, your range will be narrow and weighted
toward strong hands. As a result, your opponent will find your reraises
fairly easy to play against. But when you add weak hands to your reraising
range, you become much trickier to play against."

My question is what happens after the flop? The flop will likely not help
10,6. With 3 players remaining, when you check and fold to a bet, no one 
will
see your starting hand. How will this widen your "range of hands"?

Vince
 




 30 Posts in Topic:
Ed Miller columns
"Vince" <vcu  2008-05-31 07:20:26 
Re: Ed Miller columns
"garycarson" &l  2008-05-31 08:05:44 
Re: Ed Miller columns
Peter Secor <peter@[EM  2008-05-31 09:29:52 
Re: Ed Miller columns
"garycarson" &l  2008-06-01 02:07:57 
Re: Ed Miller columns
Travel <nine510@[EMAIL  2008-06-01 10:29:20 
Re: Ed Miller columns
"risky biz" <  2008-06-01 12:24:43 
Re: Ed Miller columns
rngri4 <me@[EMAIL PROT  2008-06-01 18:45:19 
Re: Ed Miller columns
"garycarson" &l  2008-06-01 17:23:40 
Re: Ed Miller columns
"XaQ Morphy" &l  2008-06-01 17:36:15 
Re: Ed Miller columns
"Will_gamble" &  2008-06-03 13:29:15 
Re: Ed Miller columns
"FellKnight" &l  2008-06-03 13:53:11 
Re: Ed Miller columns
"garycarson" &l  2008-06-03 15:55:08 
Re: Ed Miller columns
"FellKnight" &l  2008-06-03 16:56:52 
Re: Ed Miller columns
"Will_gamble" &  2008-06-03 17:07:25 
Re: Ed Miller columns
"FellKnight" &l  2008-06-03 17:12:01 
Re: Ed Miller columns
"Will_gamble" &  2008-06-03 17:45:27 
Re: Ed Miller columns
"risky biz" <  2008-05-31 09:28:15 
Re: Ed Miller columns
"K9way" <poo  2008-05-31 11:13:49 
Re: Ed Miller columns
"Lief" <ask.  2008-05-31 22:06:41 
Re: Ed Miller columns
"XaQ Morphy" &l  2008-05-31 14:34:12 
Re: Ed Miller columns
"Lief" <ask.  2008-06-03 16:15:14 
Re: Ed Miller columns
"Auburn Sam" &l  2008-05-31 11:38:11 
Re: Ed Miller columns
"eldo77" <ab  2008-05-31 14:05:29 
Re: Ed Miller columns
"risky biz" <  2008-06-01 00:25:29 
Re: Ed Miller columns
Deadmoney Walking <tbo  2008-05-31 15:52:16 
Re: Ed Miller columns
"Tad Perry" <  2008-05-31 16:00:45 
Re: Ed Miller columns
"Wayne Vinson"   2008-06-01 19:39:43 
Re: Ed Miller columns
A Man Beaten by Jacks <  2008-06-01 22:54:11 
Re: Ed Miller columns
Deadmoney Walking <tbo  2008-06-04 12:46:10 
Re: Ed Miller columns
"garycarson" &l  2008-06-04 15:36:42 

Post A Reply:
  Go here to Signup

AddThis Feed Button


About - Advertising - Contact - Frequently Asked Questions - Privacy Policy - Terms of Use - Signup

Contact
tan12V112 Thu Nov 20 8:58:52 CST 2008.